I Wrote on Medium Every Day for 90 Days. Here's Exactly What I Earned
Forty-seven articles in ninety days. Three did well, thirty did almost nothing, and my biggest earner was a story I nearly didn't publish because I thought it was too boring.
Everyone writing about Medium either made $20K last month or $0.43 — nobody publishes the middle. So here's the middle: every number from my 90 days, what actually drove earnings, and the five things I'd change if I were starting today.
The real numbers
- ✓$487 total across 90 days — $180 in months 1-2 combined, $307 in month 3
- ✓47 stories published, 1,142 followers gained, ~89K total views
- ✓Top 3 stories earned 61% of everything. Bottom 30 earned under $2 each
- ✓The real ROI wasn't the money: 2 freelance clients and 400+ email subscribers
How much money can you make writing on Medium in 2026?
Most writers earn under $100 a month — the median active writer has always made single digits. My 90-day total was $487: slow for two months, then $307 in month three once publications started picking up my stories. Consistent writers with 6–12 months of catalog commonly report $200–$1,000 a month. The screenshots you see of $15K months are real, and they are outliers in the way lottery winners are real.

47 stories, 90 days, one spreadsheet of humbling data.
Why I did it in public numbers
I'd been circling online writing for two years — reading about it, taking notes about it, not doing it. What finally broke the loop was picking a container small enough to be unquittable: one story a day, ninety days, track everything, publish the results no matter how embarrassing. Medium made sense as the venue because the audience is built in; on a fresh blog of my own, I'd have been writing to an empty room for six months. (That said, the own-your-platform argument is real, and I've laid out that path in how to start a blog in 2026.)
The month-by-month reality
Month one was silence. Twenty-six stories, $41. Views in the double digits for most of them. This is the month that kills almost everyone, and I get it — the effort-to-feedback ratio is genuinely absurd. What kept me going was reframing it: I wasn't earning, I was calibrating. Every story was a small bet on a topic and a format, and even the flops were data.
Month two, the pattern emerged. My generic advice pieces — the "7 habits" stuff — kept dying. The stories that moved had one thing in common: I was in them. Real numbers, real failure, something specific that happened to me. A story about a work mistake I'd made earned more in a week than my ten advice listicles combined had in two months. So I stopped writing advice and started writing evidence.
Month three is when publications changed everything. I started submitting to mid-size publications instead of self-publishing, and their distribution did what my zero-follower profile couldn't. Same quality of story, five to ten times the views. $307 that month, plus the compounding I didn't expect: two freelance clients found me through stories and paid more than Medium did in total, immediately.
What actually predicted earnings (it wasn't effort)
I tracked hours spent per story, and here's the uncomfortable finding: time invested had almost no correlation with earnings. My most-labored story (six hours) made $3. My top earner took 75 minutes, because the thinking had already happened — it was just a true story I knew cold, told straight. What did correlate:
| Factor | Effect | What I learned |
|---|---|---|
| First-person specificity | Strongest predictor | Real numbers and named failures beat polished general advice every time |
| Publication vs self-published | 5-10x views | Mid-size pubs accepted me long before big ones. Submit everywhere |
| Read ratio over 50% | Triggers wider distribution | Strong openings matter more than strong titles |
| Publishing frequency | Near zero | My 2-story weeks with better stories beat my 7-story weeks |
| Topic trendiness | Weak and short-lived | AI-topic bumps faded in days; evergreen personal stories kept paying |
⚠️ The AI-content trap
What I'd do differently from day one
If I were handing my day-one self a checklist, it's this:
The restart plan
- ✓Write 3 good stories a week, not 7 — daily publishing bought me volume of flops, not learning
- ✓Submit to mid-size publications from week one instead of self-publishing into the void for a month
- ✓Put a personal number or a failure in every story — my entire top 10 has one
- ✓Start the email list on day one, not day 40. The list is the asset; Medium is the billboard
- ✓Spend the first 30 minutes of each session reading and genuinely commenting — half my early followers came from that, not from stories
The email list point deserves emphasis. Medium's algorithm, rates, and rules can change any quarter — the 400 subscribers I moved onto my own list are the only part of the 90 days no platform can take back. Writing income that survives platform whims is the actual game; I've mapped the bigger picture in how to make money writing online.
So is Medium worth it in 2026?
As a paycheck: no. $487 for roughly 120 hours of work is under $4 an hour — a terrible freelance rate. As an asset: quietly, yes. The catalog keeps earning while I sleep ($60-90 a month now, without new stories), the clients it attracted paid 10x the platform did, and the daily deadline built a writing habit two years of intending never did. Medium in 2026 is a bad job and a good investment. Most of the people disappointed by it took the job; the ones still there are building the asset. And if you're starting from zero with no audience anywhere, it remains one of the few places a complete unknown's first month can find a thousand readers — which is worth more than the $41 it pays.
FAQ
How much money can you make writing on Medium in 2026?+
Is Medium worth writing on in 2026?+
What kind of articles do best on Medium?+
How often should you publish on Medium?+
Day 91, I didn't stop. But I did slow down — three stories a week now, each one with something true in it. The 90-day sprint's real product wasn't $487. It was finding out, with receipts, exactly what kind of writing the internet still pays for: the kind only you could have written.
Keep Reading
Try Our Free Tools
Want more guides like this?
Join 50K+ readers getting weekly tips on AI, automation & making money online.
Subscribe Free

